I. Singer et Hl. Edmonds, HEAD-UP TILT TESTING PREDICTS SYNCOPE DURING VENTRICULAR-TACHYCARDIA IN IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR PATIENTS, Journal of interventional cardiology, 11(3), 1998, pp. 205-211
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) programming is usually ba
sed on results of supine electrophysiological (EP) testing. However, E
P testing does not provide any information about tolerance to ICD ther
apy in the upright posture. We hypothesized that in addition to the ar
rhythmia duration and ventricular tachycardia (VT) cycle length, cereb
ral perfusion may play a role in determining tolerance to tiered (CD t
herapy. Transcranial Doppler (TCD) and cerebral venous oxygen saturati
on (rCVOS) are relatively new noninvasive techniques that may be used
to assess dynamic changes in cerebral blood flow and metabolism during
VT. Sixteen patients with pace-terminable VT and ICDs underwent supin
e (S) and upright tilt (HUT) ICD testing in conjunction with TCD and r
CVOS monitoring. ICDs were programmed to deliver antitachycardia pacin
g, cardioversion, and defibrillation for VT, in the ascending order of
aggressivity. Despite no significant differences in the induced VT cy
cle length (320 +/- 100 msec, S, vs 330 +/- 90 msec, HUT) and VT durat
ion (14.6 +/- 6.7 sec, S, vs 17 +/- 9.2 sec, HUT), cerebral perfusion
was more significant impared during HUT (21 +/- 10 [S] vs 29 +/- 7% de
crease from baseline [HUT], P < 0.001), and rCVOS decreased from basel
ine (5 +/- 6 [S] vs 10 +/- 6 [HUT] %, P < 0.001). Five of 16 patients
experienced syncope during HUT and none during supine testing. At I-ye
ar follow-up five patients who experienced syncope during HUT experien
ced at least one episode of syncope, whereas none not so identified di
d We conclude that: (1) Supine ICD testing is insufficient to predict
individual patient tolerance to ICD therapy; (2) HUT testing predicts
tolerance to ICD therapy; and (3) noninvasive neuromonitoring techniqu
es are useful for assessment of cerebral blood flow and metabolism dur
ing ICD testing. (J Interven Cardiol 1998; 11:205-211).