Objective: As part of a larger study of polychlorinated dibenzodioxin
(PCDD) and dibenzofuran (PCDF) pollution, to describe and compare Abor
iginal and non-Aboriginal residents' recalled diets. Methods: We surve
yed a stratified random sample aged 25 to 64 years: forest products mi
ll employees (n = 84). Aboriginal reserve residents (n = 78), and othe
r residents (n = 80). We administered a questionnaire on intake of fis
h/seafood, wild game and plants, domesticated animal meat and eggs, da
iry products, vegetable oils and cereals, age, gender, childbearing, l
actation, residence and smoking. We measured height and weight. Result
s: Reserve residents ate less seafood, but more fish, roe, eulachon gr
ease, smoked salmon, clams and sea urchins, more deer organs, hamburge
r meat, pork, fried chicken, and hotdogs, but less rabbit, beef steaks
/roasts, high-fibre cereals, potato chips, bread, cheese and milk. Con
clusions: We cannot yet quantify PCDD and PCDF intakes. The wild food
consumption data are unique and may be useful for risk assessments in
the target population and similar communities.