EPIRUBICIN VINORELBINE AS FIRST LINE THERAPY IN METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER/

Citation
E. Baldini et al., EPIRUBICIN VINORELBINE AS FIRST LINE THERAPY IN METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER/, Breast cancer research and treatment, 49(2), 1998, pp. 129-134
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
ISSN journal
01676806
Volume
49
Issue
2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
129 - 134
Database
ISI
SICI code
0167-6806(1998)49:2<129:EVAFLT>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
This study was aimed at investigating the toxicity and activity of the combination epirubicin and vinorelbine in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic breast cancer. Fifty-one patients with measurable or evaluable metastatic breast cancer entered the study. The regimen cons isted of epirubicin 90 mg/m(2) as a slow i.v. infusion on day 1, follo wed by vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) by 30-minute intravenous infusion on day s 1 and 8; the courses were repeated every 21 days for a maximum of 8 cycles. All the patients were assessable for toxicity and 47 were eval uable for response according to the World Health Organization (WHO) cr iteria. Objective responses were observed in 33 out of 47 evaluable pa tients (70.2%; 95% C.I. 55.1%-82.6%) with 4 complete (8.5%) and 29 par tial responses (61.7%); 11 patients had stable disease (23.4%) and 3 p atients progressed while on treatment. The median time to progression was 10 months (range 1 - 21) and the median overall survival was 23 mo nths (range 2 - 32+). Neutropenia was the most frequent toxicity: a gr ade 4 neutropenia (WHO) was reported in 70% of 252 courses with a medi an duration of 3 days (range 1-6). Seventeen episodes of febrile neutr openia were observed but only 1 patient required hospital admission. O ther hematologic toxicities were negligible. One patient experienced a paralytic ileus requiring hospitalization; no peripheral neuropathy s uch as muscle weakness or paresthesia was observed. No treatment-relat ed cardiotoxicity was reported. The encouraging response rate achieved with epirubicin/vinorelbine, the easily manageable toxicities of the combination, and its feasibility in an outpatient setting make this co mbination worthy of further comparative trials with standard regimens.