T. Powles et al., INTERIM ANALYSIS OF THE INCIDENCE OF BREAST-CANCER IN THE ROYAL-MARSDEN-HOSPITAL TAMOXIFEN RANDOMIZED CHEMOPREVENTION TRIAL, Lancet, 352(9122), 1998, pp. 98-101
Background Tamoxifen, a drug with antioestrogenic effects, is predicte
d to prevent the occurrence of breast cancer, We have undertaken a tri
al of tamoxifen in healthy women who are at increased risk of breast c
ancer because of family history. We report a planned interim analysis,
Methods Between October, 1986, and April, 1996, we accrued 2494 healt
hy women aged between 30 and 70 with a family history of breast cancer
, They have been randomised (double blind) to receive tamoxifen 20 mg
per day orally or placebo for up to 8 years. Follow-up included clinic
al assessment, annual mammography, and assessment of toxicity and comp
liance. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of breast cancer, whic
h was analysed on an intention-to-treat basis with a survival curve. F
indings With a median follow-up of 70 months, 2471 women (tamoxifen 12
38, placebo 1233) were suitable for analysis, The groups were evenly m
atched at baseline, and compliance was good. The overall frequency of
breast cancer is the same for women on tamoxifen or placebo (tamoxifen
34, placebo 36, relative risk 1.06 [95% CI 0.7-1.7], p=0.8). Particip
ants who were already on hormone-replacement therapy when they entered
the study had an increased risk of breast cancer compared with nonuse
rs. Those participants who started such therapy while on trial had a s
ignificantly reduced risk. The safety profile of tamoxifen was as expe
cted. Interpretation We have been unable to show any effect of tamoxif
en on breast-cancer incidence in healthy women, contrary to the report
from the NSABP-P1 study showing a 45% reduction in healthy women give
n tamoxifen versus placebo. Differences in the study populations for t
he two trials may underlie these conflicting findings: eligibility in
our trial was based predominantly on a strong family history of breast
cancer whereas in the NSABP trial was mostly based on non-genetic ris
k factors. The importance of oestrogen promotion may vary between such
populations.