REPRODUCTIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE FLOWER BREEDING DROSOPHILA-HIBISCI BOCK (DROSOPHILIDAE) IN EASTERN AUSTRALIA - GENETIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINANTS OF OVARIOLE NUMBER
Wt. Starmer et al., REPRODUCTIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE FLOWER BREEDING DROSOPHILA-HIBISCI BOCK (DROSOPHILIDAE) IN EASTERN AUSTRALIA - GENETIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINANTS OF OVARIOLE NUMBER, Evolution, 52(3), 1998, pp. 806-815
Quantitative genetic analysis of the ovariole number of the Australian
Hibiscus flower-breeding Drosophila hibisci Bock was conducted on pop
ulations from two localities along a latitudinal cline in ovariole num
ber previously observed in the species (Starmer et al., in press). Par
ental strains, F-1, F-1r (reciprocal), F-2, backcross, and backcross r
eciprocal generations were used in a line-cross (generation means) ana
lysis. This analysis revealed both additive and epistatic effects as i
mportant determinants of variation in ovariole number when larvae were
reared at 25 degrees C. Maternal effects and maternal-by-progeny gene
tic interactions were not significant. These results are comparable to
previous studies that document epistatic components as genetic determ
inants of ovariole number in D. melanogaster. Parallel studies on ovar
iole number in D. hibisci parental and hybrid generations (F-1 and F-1
r,) reared as larvae at three temperatures (18 degrees, 21.5 degrees,
and 25 degrees C) showed environmental effects and genotype-by-environ
ment interactions as significant influences on the phenotype. Maternal
effects were present when temperature of larval development was consi
dered and significant, nonlinear environmental effects were detected.
Field collections of D, hibisci females showed that held conditions re
sult in significant departure of ovariole number from comparable labor
atory reared females. The significant epistatic genetic effects, genot
ype-by-environment interactions, and maternal effects indicate that th
e genetic architecture of traits, such as ovariole number, may be more
complex than often acknowledged and thus may be compatible with Wrigh
t's view of a netlike relationship between the genome and complex char
acters (Wright 1968).