EFFECTS OF CHANGES IN SMOKING STATUS ON RISK ESTIMATES FOR MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION AMONG WOMEN RECRUITED FOR THE ROYAL-COLLEGE OF GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS ORAL CONTRACEPTION STUDY IN THE UK
V. Owensmith et al., EFFECTS OF CHANGES IN SMOKING STATUS ON RISK ESTIMATES FOR MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION AMONG WOMEN RECRUITED FOR THE ROYAL-COLLEGE OF GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS ORAL CONTRACEPTION STUDY IN THE UK, Journal of epidemiology and community health, 52(7), 1998, pp. 420-424
Study objective-To determine whether changes in smoking status among w
omen recruited for the Royal College of General Practitioners' Oral Co
ntraception Study affected previous risk estimates for myocardial infa
rction. Design-(1) Postal survey between November 1994 and July 1995 o
f women still under general practitioner observation. Validation of th
e smoking information supplied by the women on the questionnaire by co
mparison with that reported by the general practitioner at recruitment
to the main study. (2) Nested case-control study of 103 cases of myoc
ardial infarction, matched with 309 controls, to see if different risk
estimates were obtained when smoking status at recruitment or smoking
status at time of event were used in the analysis. Setting-650 genera
l practices throughout the United Kingdom. Participants-10 073 women w
ho responded to the questionnaire (85.4% of 11 797 sent out). Main res
ults-There was good agreement between smoking information recorded by
the general practitioner at recruitment and that supplied retrospectiv
ely by respondents to the questionnaire. The risk estimates for myocar
dial infarction associated with use of combined oral contraceptives (C
OCs) were almost identical irrespective of whether smoking status at r
ecruitment or at time of event was used for the statistical adjustment
. This was because few women stopped smoking while also using COCs. In
fact, fewer regular smokers who have ever used COCs reported stopping
smoking than never users. The risk estimates for myocardial infarctio
n associated with smoking were smaller when smoking habits at recruitm
ent was used than when smoking habits at time of event was used. Concl
usions-Previous results from the Oral Contraception Study regarding th
e effects of COCs are unlikely to hare been biased by changes in the s
moking habits of the cohort, but the effects of smoking have probably
been underestimated. There is still a need for effective health educat
ion regarding the risks associated with smoking, particularly among us
ers of COCs.