Ck. Conners, RATING-SCALES IN ATTENTION-DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER - USE IN ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT MONITORING/, The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 59, 1998, pp. 24-30
Rating scales are valuable tools in both assessment and treatment moni
toring. However, caution in their use is indicated because of several
types of rater errors. Recent large-scale normative studies provide a
set of instruments that cover child, adolescent, and adult ages, with
separate gender norms and large representative samples. By including D
SM-IV symptoms for ADHD in a proposed nationwide standardization of pa
rent, teacher, and self-report scales, it is apparent that the propose
d subtypes of ADHD are reasonable; however, item content in this stand
ardization is somewhat broader than that proposed by DSM-IV. Empirical
indexes were created and cross-validated, providing powerful discrimi
nation between ADHD and non-ADHD samples. Separate scoring for the tra
ditional DSM subtypes of ADHD allows both categorical and dimensional
measures to be used in assessment and treatment monitoring.