D. Reitman, PUNISHED BY MISUNDERSTANDING - A CRITICAL-EVALUATION OF KOHNS PUNISHED BY REWARDS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS WITH CHILDREN, The Behavior analyst, 21(1), 1998, pp. 143-157
Despite the growth of behavior analysis over the past 30 years, misund
erstandings of behavioral theory and practice may threaten its continu
ed growth and application. Alfie Kohn's Punished by Rewards: The Troub
le with Gold Stars, Incentive Plans, A's, Praise, and Other Bribes (19
93) offers a view of behaviorism that, if accepted uncritically, could
hinder efforts to disseminate behavioral interventions, particularly
those involving children. A comprehensive review of Punished by Reward
s revealed the following assumptions: (a) Behavior analysis is exclusi
vely derived from animal research; (b) behavior analysts characterize
children as passive agents to be manipulated; (c) behavior analysis is
a behavior control technology; (d) behavior analysts are uninterested
in and ignorant of the causes of behavior; and (e) behavior analysts
are unconcerned about the protection and welfare of children. For each
class of assumptions, critique and commentary are offered. Empirical
and philosophical aspects of Kohn's arguments are scrutinized, and the
implications of continued misunderstandings for the future of behavio
r analysis and the need for more accurate dissemination of contemporar
y applied behavioral research are also discussed. Despite Kohn's appar
ent biases against behaviorism, it is concluded that a better informed
public would find much to like about contemporary behavior analysis.