One of the more difficult issues in the development of each edition of
the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Man
ual of Mental Disorders (DSM) has been a possible sex bias in the pers
onality disorder diagnoses, A substantial amount of discussion and res
earch on this issue has occurred since the 1980 publication of the thi
rd edition of the DSM, It is now apparent that there are a number of d
ifferent ways in which the differential sex prevalence rates for the D
SM-IV personality disorders could reflect a sex bias, including biased
diagnostic constructs, biased thresholds for diagnosis, biased popula
tion sampling, biased application of diagnostic criteria, biased instr
uments of assessment, and biased diagnostic criteria. It is important
to understand these different forms of sex bias, as each can occur ind
ependently of, be confused with, and interact with one another. The pu
rpose of this paper is to differentiate among, and to describe the sup
port for, each of these different forms of sex bias, with the hope of
contributing to their recognition and ultimate resolution.