Contact allergy to thimerosal (TH) has not been considered a marker fo
r mercury allergy, since there is a low degree of cross-sensitivity to
inorganic as well as to organic mercury salts. 40 subjects, who previ
ously gave a positive patch test reaction only to thimerosal 0.1% pet.
(Hermal), when simultaneously repatch-tested to solutions containing
TH, mersalyl acid, p-amino-phenylmercuric acid, mercuric acetate and t
hiosalicylic acid, respectively, gave positive reactions only to TH. 3
6 out of 40 subjects were divided into 2 groups of 18 subjects and sim
ultaneously repatch-tested to solutions containing TH, methylmercury c
hloride (MeHgCl), thiosalicylic acid, and, ethylmercury chloride (EtHg
Cl), respectively. EtHgCl was tested in the Ist group at 0.031% and in
the 2nd group at 0.015%. The results showed that all subjects gave co
ncomitant positive reactions to TH, EtHgCl and MeHgCl. EtHgCl 0.031% g
ave a higher number of +++ reactions than EtHgCl 0.015%, underlining t
he role of the solvent in these reactions. Patch test results in 300 c
onsecutive patients to a standard series, to which MeHgCl was added, s
howed that MeHgCl and TH were never able to give isolated positive rea
ctions, and that the concomitant positive reactions occurred in only 3
.6% of subjects. In conclusion, our data seem to suggest that the posi
tive reactions to TH found in our patients were due to EtHgCl, and tha
t the structural similarities with MeHgCl were so close that the skin
reacted against each as if they were identical.