Reciprocity, or the ''giving back'' by the researcher to the subjects
of the research in the fieldwork situation, is not often mentioned by
the authors of fieldwork methodologies or ethnographies. When it is me
ntioned, the pitfalls that can accompany it are rarely examined, and i
t is usually presented as an unequivocally desirable practice. From ex
periences with reciprocity during fieldwork with women who make the ar
t form known as the arpillera in Chile, the author concludes that reci
procity can be a source of insight and improved relations, but it can
also cause problems for the subjects and the research. Far from unambi
guously positive, reciprocity can prove a potential minefield because
of the ever-changing membership status of the researcher in the group
and because of differences in power, knowledge, and culture between th
e researcher and the researched.