In this article, literature concerning the quantitative synthesis (met
a-analysis) of single-subject research literature is reviewed. First,
the general rationale for such an approach is discussed. Next procedur
es for synthesizing single-subject literature are described, followed
by comments and critiques of those procedures. Finally, a review is pr
esented of the results of applications of those procedures. The author
s suggest that procedures based on percentage of nonoverlapping data (
PND) between baseline and treatment are justifiable, meaningful, and-a
cross nine applications-have produced results that are highly meaningf
ul and faithful to the original research reports.