A salient feature of mammalian X dosage compensation is that X-inactiv
ation occurs without regard to the parental origin of either active or
inactive X. However, there are variations on the theme of random inac
tivation, namely paternal X inactivation in marsupials and in placenta
l tissues of some mammals. Whether inactivation is random or paternal
seems to depend on the time when this developmental program is initiat
ed. As deletions of the X inactivation center (XIC/Xic) and/or the X i
nactive specific transcript (XIST/Xist) gene result in failure of cis
X-inactivation, mutations in genes from this region might lead to pref
erential inactivation of one X chromosome or the other. The Xce locus
in the murine Xic is considered a prototype for this model. Recent stu
dies suggest that choice involves maintaining the activity of one X, w
hile the other(s) by default is programmed to become inactive. Also, c
hoice resides within the XIC, so that mutations elsewhere, although pe
rhaps able to interfere with cis inactivation, are not likely to affec
t the X chromosome from only one parent. Mutations affecting the choic
e of active X will be more difficult to detect in humans than in inbre
d laboratory mice because of the greater allelic differences between m
aternal and paternal X chromosomes; some of these differences predispo
se to growth competition between the mosaic cell populations. I sugges
t that the skewing of inactivation patterns observed in human females
most often occurs after random X inactivation, and is due mainly to ce
ll selection favoring alleles that provide a relative growth advantage
.