Mj. Shipitalo et Wm. Edwards, RUNOFF AND EROSION CONTROL WITH CONSERVATION TILLAGE AND REDUCED-INPUT PRACTICES ON CROPPED WATERSHEDS, Soil & tillage research, 46(1-2), 1998, pp. 1-12
The North Appalachian Experimental Watershed near Coshocton, OH was es
tablished in 1935 to develop, evaluate, and refine conservation practi
ces that reduce runoff and erosion under the hilly, humid conditions o
f the northeastern United States. Small (0.5 to 1 ha), single-practice
, gaged watersheds comprised of sandstone- and shale-derived residual
soils are used to evaluate the interaction of management, climate, and
soils. In a 28-year, nine-watershed study, 92% of the erosion occurre
d during the corn (Zea mays L.) years of a 4-year corn/wheat (Triticum
aestivum L.)/meadow/meadow rotation. These watersheds were moldboard
plowed prior to planting corn and cultivation was used for weed contro
l. By tilling and planting on the contour and increasing fertility lev
els, soil loss was reduced more than 3-fold, but still averaged 4.7 Mg
ha(-1) during corn years. Thus, annual production of row crops on a s
ustainable basis was not without risk. A 6-year, six-watershed study i
ndicated that by using reduced tillage (no-till, chisel, or paraplow)
and herbicides, corn and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] can be grown
in rotation with an average soil loss of 0.5 Mg ha(-1) yr(-1), well b
elow the stipulated soil loss tolerance of 7.8 Mg ha(-1) yr(-1), if a
winter cover crop of rye (Secale cereale L.) followed soybean. Under t
hese conditions, however, concentrations of surface-applied herbicides
and nitrate in runoff frequently exceeded drinking water standards, p
articularly in the first few runoff events after application, and may
be a concern. A reduced-input management practice for corn and soybean
production with light disking and cultivation for weed control and ma
nure and a legume (red clover, Trifolium pratense L.) to supply some o
f the nitrogen was implemented to determine if a balance between losse
s of soil and purchased chemical inputs could be obtained. In a B-year
comparison, soil losses were similar to those under conservation till
age, but the risk of yield loss increased due to inability to cultivat
e in a timely manner due to weather conditions. Regardless of tillage
practice, infrequent, severe storms during years when row crops were g
rown caused most of the soil loss from the watersheds. Erosion predict
ion models must account for the contribution of such events and manage
ment practices must limit erosion caused by these storms if long-term
sustainability is to be maintained. (C) 1998 Published by Elsevier Sci
ence B.V.