T. Steiner et al., THE ECASS 3-HOUR COHORT - SECONDARY ANALYSIS OF ECASS DATA BY TIME STRATIFICATION, Cerebrovascular diseases, 8(4), 1998, pp. 198-203
Objectives: (1) To determine whether and how outcome measurements in t
he ECASS trial are influenced by a shorter time window (0-3 vs. 3-6 h)
between onset of symptoms and start of thrombolytic therapy using rec
ombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) in acute ischemic stroke
. (2) To discuss the results of the ECASS 0- to 3-hour cohort with the
results of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Strok
e Study (NINDSS). Design and Analysis: Analysis of the 0- to 3-hour an
d the 3- to 6-hour cohort in accordance with the ECASS protocol. Compa
rative analysis of the ECASS and NINDSS results following the NINDSS p
rotocol using dichotomized endpoints. Main Outcome Measures: Primary e
ndpoints: modified Rankin Scale, Barthel Index; secondary endpoints: c
ombined Barthel/Rankin, long-term Scandinavian Stroke Scale, National
Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, mortality at 30 and 90 days, occurr
ence of intracranial hemorrhage. NINDS trial endpoint: favorable outco
me as defined in the NINDS trial. Results: In ECASS, 87 patients were
randomized within 3 h of stroke onset. Differences in favor of rt-PA t
reatment can be found for all primary and secondary outcome measures i
n the ECASS O- to 3-hour cohort, except for mortality at day 30, which
is somewhat higher in the rt-pA-treated group. However, due to the sm
all sample size, the differences do not reach statistical significance
. Early infarct signs (as defined by the ECASS protocol) are found as
early as 2 h after stroke onset. Parenchymal hemorrhages are found sig
nificantly more often among rt-PA-treated patients. The results in the
ECASS O- to 3-hour cohort fit well with the results in NINDSS. Conclu
sion: Data from the 3-hour ECASS cohort support the efficacy of early
thrombolytic therapy in acute hemispheric stroke patients. Comparing b
leeding complications between the ECASS and NINDSS is difficult becaus
e of differences in the definition and occurrence of hemorrhagic event
s.