The difficulty in processing two stimuli at once increases with their
separation. Therefore to demonstrate constraints in dividing attention
between objects, the effects of their spatial separation must be cont
rolled. Duncan used superimposed objects to achieve this, and showed t
hat judging two attributes is more accurate if they concern one object
than if they concern two objects (Duncan, J. 1984. Journal of Experim
ental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517). However, critics claim that
differences in the spatial or spatial-frequency extent of attention ex
ist between these conditions. We studied transparent motion defined by
two sets of differently colored dots that were interspersed in the sa
me region of space, and matched in spatial and spatial frequency prope
rties. Each set moved in a distinct and randomly chosen direction. We
found that simultaneous judgments of speed and direction were more acc
urate when they concerned only one set than when they concerned differ
ent sets. Furthermore, appraisal of the directions taken by two sets o
f dots is more difficult than judging direction for only one set, a di
fficulty that increases for briefer motion. We conclude that perceptua
l grouping by common fate exerted a more powerful constraint than spat
ial proximity, a result consistent with object-based attention. Eviden
ce that this type of object-based attention operates at early stages o
f vision is examined. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserv
ed.