SAFETY OF PLASMAPHERESIS IN THE TREATMENT OF NEUROLOGICAL DISEASE

Authors
Citation
S. Vucic et L. Davies, SAFETY OF PLASMAPHERESIS IN THE TREATMENT OF NEUROLOGICAL DISEASE, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine, 28(3), 1998, pp. 301-305
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal
ISSN journal
00048291
Volume
28
Issue
3
Year of publication
1998
Pages
301 - 305
Database
ISI
SICI code
0004-8291(1998)28:3<301:SOPITT>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Background: Plasmapheresis is used as a treatment modality in several neurological disorders. Adverse reactions relating to vascular access, replacement fluid and anticoagulant use have been reported. Aims: To establish the incidence of complications of therapeutic plasmapheresis in the treatment of neurological diseases. Methods: A retrospective s tudy was performed, in which case records of patients undergoing plasm apheresis for neurological indications between 1 April 1992 and 1 Sept ember 1996 were reviewed for fatalities and adverse reactions related to vascular access, transmission of Hepatitis B or C or Human Immunode ficiency Virus (HIV), fluid imbalance, allergic or febrile reactions, haematological complications, machine failure and citrate toxicity. Re sults: In the study period, 1283 plasmapheresis procedures were perfor med on 73 patients with neurological disease. There were no fatalities , no cases of Hepatitis B or C or HIV transmission, no allergic or feb rile reactions, thrombosis, bleeding diathesis or severe citrate toxic ity. Infections related to venous access occurred in 0.5 per cent of p rocedures with septicaemia in 0.2 per cent of procedures (4.1% of pati ents). Less serious complications included hypotension in 1.2 per cent of procedures (11% of patients) and citrate toxicity manifesting as n ausea, vomiting, cramping or paraesthesia in 1.2 per cent of procedure s. Machine failure occurred in 0.2 per cent of procedures. Conclusions : Plasmapheresis is a safe procedure when performed for neurological i ndications by experienced personnel in a large pheresis unit. The most frequent adverse event is infection of the venous access site.