AN EMPIRICAL DETERMINATION OF THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF MEASUREMENTS NEEDED TO ESTIMATE THE MEAN RANDOM VITRINITE REFLECTANCE OF DISSEMINATED ORGANIC-MATTER
Ce. Barker et Mj. Pawlewicz, AN EMPIRICAL DETERMINATION OF THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF MEASUREMENTS NEEDED TO ESTIMATE THE MEAN RANDOM VITRINITE REFLECTANCE OF DISSEMINATED ORGANIC-MATTER, Organic geochemistry, 20(6), 1993, pp. 643-651
In coal samples, published recommendations based on statistical method
s suggest 100 measurements are needed to estimate the mean random vitr
inite reflectance (R(v-r)) to within +/-2%. Our survey of published th
ermal maturation studies indicates that those using dispersed organic
matter (DOM) mostly have an objective of acquiring 50 reflectance meas
urements. This smaller objective size in DOM versus that for coal samp
les poses a statistical contradiction because the standard deviations
of DOM reflectance distributions are typically larger indicating a gre
ater sample size is needed to accurately estimate R(v-r) in DOM. Howev
er, in studies of thermal maturation using DOM, even 50 measurements c
an be an unrealistic requirement given the small amount of vitrinite o
ften found in such samples. Furthermore, there is generally a reduced
need for assuring precision like that needed for coal applications. Th
erefore, a key question in thermal maturation studies using DOM is how
many measurements of R(v-r) are needed to adequately estimate the mea
n. Our empirical approach to this problem is to compute the reflectanc
e distribution statistics: mean, standard deviation, skewness, and kur
tosis in increments of 10 measurements. This study compares these inte
rmediate computations of R(v-r) statistics with a final one computed u
sing all measurements for that sample. Vitrinite reflectance was measu
red on mudstone and sandstone samples taken from borehole M-25 in the
Cerro Prieto, Mexico geothermal system which was selected because the
rocks have a wide range of thermal maturation and a comparable humic D
OM with depth. The results of this study suggest that after only 20-30
measurements the mean R(v-r) is generally known to within 5% and alwa
ys to within 12% of the mean R(v-r) calculated using all of the measur
ed particles. Thus, even in the worst case, the precision after measur
ing only 20-30 particles is in good agreement with the general precisi
on of one decimal place recommended for mean R(v-r) measurements on DO
M. The coefficient of variation (V = standard deviation/mean) is propo
sed as a statistic to indicate the reliability of the mean R(v-r) esti
mates made at n much less than 20. This preliminary study suggests a V
< 0.1 indicates a reliable mean and a V > 0.2 suggests an unreliable
mean in such small samples.