Crm. Hay et al., THE EFFECT OF MONOCLONAL OR ION-EXCHANGE PURIFIED FACTOR-VIII CONCENTRATE ON HIV DISEASE PROGRESSION - A PROSPECTIVE COHORT COMPARISON, British Journal of Haematology, 101(4), 1998, pp. 632-637
The CD4 count has been reported to decline less rapidly in HIV-infecte
d haemophiliacs treated with monoclonally purified factor VIII concent
rates than in those using intermediate-purity concentrates. No surviva
l advantage has been demonstrated for this effect, and it is unclear w
hether this effect occurs with all high-purity concentrates. Two cohor
ts of patients with severe haemophilia A and HIV treated with either i
on-exchange-purified or monoclonally-purified concentrates were compar
ed. The CD4 count, survival, AIDS-defining illnesses, CDC category and
antiretroviral therapy were recorded at 6-monthly intervals for 3 yea
rs following the change from intermediate to high-purity factor VIII.
116 patients were recruited, 37 of whom were treated with an ion-excha
nge purified factor VIII concentrate at three centres, mean (SD) age 3
1.1 (12.2) years, and 79 were treated with monoclonally purified facto
r VIII concentrate at two centres, mean (SD) age 29.8 (11.2)years. At
the start of the study the median CD4 count was (monoclonal nu ion-exc
hange) 0.30 v 0.16x10(9)/l. The CD4 count declined in both arms to a m
edian of (monoclonal nu ion-exchange) 0.16 nu 0.08 x 10(9)/l at the fi
nal visit. Analysis of the (CD4 count)(1/2) over time, using a random
coefficients model, found that the mean (SE) rates of decline were not
statistically significantly different in the two treatment groups (mo
noclonal nu ion exchange: -0.050 (0.008) nu -0.034(0.011) (CD4 count)(
1/2) per year, P=0.24). No statistically significant difference in sur
vival (log-rank test: P=0.33) was found. There was no difference in th
e proportion of individuals experiencing one or more AIDS-defining ill
nesses (P=0.32) or in the proportion progressing to CDC category TV (P
=0.28) during the study. The CD4 count declined during the study at a
rate similar to that previously reported in patients treated with inte
rmediate-purity factor VIII concentrate, and there was no evidence of
any difference between the two treatment groups.