A critical review is given of the tests available for the assessment o
f the action of anticoagulants, such as heparins, oral anticoagulants
and direct thrombin inhibitors, in patients under antithrombotic thera
py. The principle of action and the performance of the thromboplastin
time (PT), the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), the whole
blood clotting time, the thrombin time, the ecarin clotting time and
the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) is discussed, as well as the e
vidence behind the accepted therapeutic ranges. The two most common te
sts, PT and aPTT, respond in an essentially different way to clinicall
y effective anticoagulation with heparin and with oral anticoagulants.
This means that they covariate with, but do not themselves represent
the essential parameter influenced by anticoagulation. The experimenta
l basis for the widely accepted two times prolongation of the aPTT as
an indicator for adequate anticoagulation is shown to be meagre in the
case of unfractionated heparin and lacking for the other anticoagulan
ts. Common sources for error in the interpretation of anti-factor Xa-
and anti-thrombin activity of heparins are indicated. Extensive experi
ence with new tests like the ecarin clotting time and the ETP is still
lacking. On the basis of preliminary data and in view of the importan
ce of the enzymatic action of thrombin in the pathogenesis of thrombos
is, the ETP is considered a possible candidate for a common parameter
to assess different types of anticoagulants.