This article considers some methodological issues that arise when empi
rical inquiry is conducted within the framework of qualitative assumpt
ions about the nature of reality and how we as humans can know it. The
se assumptions posit an empirical reality that is complex, intertwined
, best understood as a contextual whole, and inseparable from the indi
viduals-including the researchers-who know that reality. Four primary
issues are considered in this article: the researcher as interpreter;
the emergent nature of qualitative research; understanding the experie
nce of others; and trustworthiness in qualitative research. Further, t
he article discusses methodological practices that have arisen in the
context of qualitative assumptions and issues. The practices described
are drawn from diverse qualitative research traditions, including par
ticipant observation, naturalistic inquiry, grounded theory, hermeneut
ic approaches to the interpretation of texts (and actions as texts), q
ualitative evaluation, and a body of methodological literature that ca
lls itself generically ''qualitative research.'' The goals of the arti
cle are threefold: (1) to present the internal rationale of qualitativ
e research as issues and practices that arise within the context of as
sumptions about reality and what we can know about it; (2) to encourag
e researchers to examine the relevance of qualitative assumptions, iss
ues, and practices to their own research problems; and (3) to point re
aders toward more detailed discussions of qualitative research.