EMBRACING AMBIGUITIES AND VALUING OURSELVES - ISSUES OF VALIDITY IN ACTION RESEARCH

Authors
Citation
H. Waterman, EMBRACING AMBIGUITIES AND VALUING OURSELVES - ISSUES OF VALIDITY IN ACTION RESEARCH, Journal of advanced nursing, 28(1), 1998, pp. 101-105
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Nursing
Journal title
ISSN journal
03092402
Volume
28
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
101 - 105
Database
ISI
SICI code
0309-2402(1998)28:1<101:EAAVO->2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
Further elucidation is required on the validity of action research. Th e tendency of nurse action researchers to rely on perspectives of vali dity horn qualitative or ethnographic research only gives a partial pi cture. Three categories of validity regarding action research are prop osed in order to develop understandings and to stimulate debate: diale ctical, critical and reflexive. Tensions and processes, moral responsi bilities, reflexivity and accounts of action research are discussed to illuminate the validity of action research. The complexity and contra dictions inherent even when attempting to demonstrate its validity are highlighted and illustrated with reference to examples of action rese arch.