Extensive clinical experience with the implantable cardioverter defibr
illator (ICD) combined with recently completed prospective, randomized
trials like MADIT and AVID, have demonstrated the lifesaving efficacy
of this therapy and its superiority compared to conventional medical
management in treating patients at high risk of sudden arrhythmic deat
h. This evidence has in turn spurred great interest in further ICD stu
dies. Since the ability of the ICD to save lives is no longer in quest
ion, there is a need to reexamine the real objectives of these neu stu
dies.