Sk. Chhabra, FORCED VITAL CAPACITY, SLOW VITAL CAPACITY, OR INSPIRATORY VITAL CAPACITY - WHICH IS THE BEST MEASURE OF VITAL CAPACITY, The Journal of asthma, 35(4), 1998, pp. 361-365
Vital capacity can be measured as forced vital capacity (FVC), slow vi
tal capacity (SVC), and inspiratory vital capacity (IVC). Although it
is well known that the latter two are generally greater, a systematic
comparison of the three in subjects with different degrees of airways
obstruction has not been made. Sixty asthmatics and 20 normal subjects
performed maneuvers for measurement of FVC, SVC, and IVC on a dry, ro
lling-seal spirometer. The severity of airways obstruction in asthmati
cs was classified as mild, moderate, and severe. There was no signific
ant difference between FVC, SVC, and IVC in normal subjects. However,
the three measurements of vital capacity were significantly different
in all subgroups of asthmatics. FVC was smaller than both SVC and IVC.
The differences were more marked in patients with moderate and severe
degrees of airways obstruction.The differences between SVC and IVC we
re small and clinically not important. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s
ec (FEV1) expressed as percent of FVC, SVC, and IVC, was not different
in normals and asthmatics with mild airways obstruction. The ratios w
ere significantly different in asthmatics with moderate and severe air
ways obstruction. FEV1/IVC ratio was the lowest in both the groups fol
lowed by FEV1/SVC and FEV1/FVC. IVC and SVC are greater than FVC in pa
tients with airways obstruction. This difference increases as the degr
ee of obstruction increases. The difference between SVC or IVC and FVC
serves as an indicator of air trapping. Both FVC and IVC could be mea
sured and the largest VC used to calculate the FEV1/VC ratio because t
his increases the sensitivity of spirometry in detecting airways obstr
uction.