Fl. Paradisohardy et al., STEADY-STATE PHARMACOKINETICS OF PROPRANOLOL ENANTIOMERS IN HEALTHY MALE-VOLUNTEERS, International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 36(7), 1998, pp. 370-375
Objective: To describe the steady-state pharmacokinetics of (R)-, (S)-
and racemic (rac) propranolol in 15 normotensive, male volunteers in
a double-blind, randomized, 3-way, crossover study. Methods: (R)-propr
anolol 80 mg, (S)-propranolol 80 mg, or rac-propranolol 160 mg was adm
inistered twice daily for 3 days. Multiple blood samples were collecte
d for up to 12 hours on the fourth day to characterize the steady-stat
e pharmacokinetic profile of each enantiomer. Results: (R)-propranolol
bound to plasma proteins to a lesser extent than (S)-propranolol when
it was administered both as a racemic mixture (15.8% versus 13.0%) an
d as a pure enantiomer (15.8% versus 12.9%), respectively (p < 0.05).
No stereoselective pharmacokinetic differences were observed between t
otal (bound and unbound) and unbound (R)- and (S)-propranolol. The AUC
(0-720) of (R)-propranolol was significantly higher when administered
as a racemic mixture than when given as a pure enantiomer (p < 0.01),
suggesting the disposition of (R)-propranolol may be influenced by (S)
-propranolol. Conclusion: Stereoselective steady-state pharmacokinetic
differences in AUC(0-720) were observed between (R)- and (S)-proprano
lol.