This article contends that the use of media diplomacy as a theoretical
concept has been highly confusing and misleading. It substantially re
vises and restricts the concept to one particular and distinctive rela
tionship between the media and diplomacy. The article expands and adds
two more conceptual models, public diplomacy and media-broker diploma
cy, to investigate the other relationships. Each model exists only whe
n certain characteristics or conditions are present, and each has diff
erent professional and ethical ramifications for the three main factor
s involved in diplomacy: the government, the media, and public opinion
.The article demonstrates the analytical usefulness of the models thro
ugh applications to various examples and case studies of significant c
ontemporary diplomatic processes.