Pd. Sloane et al., ENVIRONMENTAL CORRELATES OF RESIDENT AGITATION IN ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE SPECIAL CARE UNITS, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 46(7), 1998, pp. 862-869
OBJECTIVE: To determine the point prevalence of agitated behaviors in
a representative sample of Alzheimer's disease Special Care Units, and
to determine the extent to which agitation is associated with aspects
of the treatment environment, DESIGN: A cross-sectional study in whic
h nonparticipant observers recorded 3723 observations of resident beha
viors in 53 Alzheimer's disease Special Care Units. Observational data
were gathered on the physical environment and staff treatment in thes
e settings, and resident characteristics were extracted from a data ba
se developed in the study states by the Wealth Care Financing Agency.
Analyses studied the association between aspects of the staff and phys
ical environment and resident agitation levels, controlling for reside
nt cognitive and functional status. SETTING: Special Care Units in nur
sing homes in Kansas, Maine, Mississippi, and South Dakota. PARTICIPAN
TS: All residents and staff of the participating units. MAIN OUTCOME M
EASURES:Eight specific agitated behaviors and two indexes of resident
agitation were measured by direct observation by research assistants o
n three to four data collection walk-throughs in each of the study fac
ilities. RESULTS: The most common agitated behaviors noted were repeti
tive mannerisms (4.5% of resident observations) and non-loud verbal ex
cess (3.8%). Wandering, which frequently reflects agitation, was noted
in 6,5% of resident observations. The proportion of residents exhibit
ing an agitated behavior varied from none in some units to 38% in one
unit. Independent correlates of low unit agitation levels included fav
orable scores on measures of the physical environment and of staff tre
atment activities, low rates of physical restraint use, a high proport
ion of residents in bed during the day, small unit size, low levels of
resident functional dependency, and fewer numbers of comorbid conditi
ons. CONCLUSIONS: While the prevalence of agitation tends to increase
as Alzheimer's disease progresses, modifiable treatment factors appear
to have a strong influence on the prevalence of agitation. Both physi
cal design and staff treatment appear to influence agitation rates, as
do some measures consistent with a low stimulus approach to Alzheimer
's care.