Wl. Woolverton et Jk. Rowlett, CHOICE MAINTAINED BY COCAINE OR FOOD IN MONKEYS - EFFECTS OF VARYING PROBABILITY OF REINFORCEMENT, Psychopharmacology, 138(1), 1998, pp. 102-106
Several theoretical models of choice, including matching, maximizing a
nd probability matching, have evolved from the experimental analysis o
f behavior. However, these models are based largely on results of stud
ies involving non-drug reinforcers. The extent to which the choice to
self-administer a drug of abuse conforms to these models is largely un
known. The present study was designed to examine the effects of varyin
g probability of reinforcement of two options on choice by rhesus monk
eys maintained under a discrete-trials choice procedure. One group of
monkeys (n=5) was prepared with chronic indwelling venous catheters an
d responding was maintained by IV injections of cocaine (0.05 or 0.2 m
g/kg per injection). In a second group, behavioral conditions were ide
ntical, except that responding was maintained by the delivery of food
pellets. Two choice options were available to each group. Each option
was maintained by the identical dose of cocaine or amount of food, but
with varying probabilities of delivery. The percentage of trials on w
hich monkeys chose option 1 increased with its probability of reinforc
ement for cocaine (0.05 or 0.2 mg/kg per injection) and this effect di
d not change with dose of cocaine. When probabilities of reinforcement
for option 1/option 2 were 0.75/0.25, choice was exclusive for the hi
gher probability option. Results were identical when behavior was main
tained by food. The present experiment supports the conclusion that ex
clusive choice of the alternative with the higher probability of reinf
orcement can be extended to cocaine as a reinforcer. The present resul
ts also extend the known conditions under which drug-maintained respon
ding is similar to food-maintained responding to situations involving
options with different probabilities of reinforcement, i.e., probabili
ty choice. Probability matching was not observed, arguing that this mo
del does not predict drug or food choice.