SURVIVAL AND FEV1 DECLINE IN INDIVIDUALS WITH SEVERE DEFICIENCY OF ALPHA(1)-ANTITRYPSIN

Citation
Ce. Vreim et al., SURVIVAL AND FEV1 DECLINE IN INDIVIDUALS WITH SEVERE DEFICIENCY OF ALPHA(1)-ANTITRYPSIN, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 158(1), 1998, pp. 49-59
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Emergency Medicine & Critical Care","Respiratory System
ISSN journal
1073449X
Volume
158
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
49 - 59
Database
ISI
SICI code
1073-449X(1998)158:1<49:SAFDII>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Subjects greater than or equal to 18 yr of age with serum alpha(1)-ant itrypsin (alpha(1)-AT) levels less than or equal to 11 mu M or a ZZ ge notype were followed for 3.5 to 7 yr with spirometry measurements ever y 6 to 12 mo as part of a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Re gistry of Patients with Severe Deficiency of Alpha-1-Antitrypsin. Amon g all 1,129 enrollees, 5-yr mortality was 19% (95% CI: 16 to 21%). In multivariate analyses of 1,048 subjects who had been contacted greater than or equal to 6 mo after enrolling, age and baseline FEV1% predict ed were significant predictors of mortality. Results also showed that those subjects receiving augmentation therapy had decreased mortality (risk ratio [RR] = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.94, p = 0.02) as compared w ith those not receiving therapy. Among 927 subjects with two or more F EV1 measurements greater than or equal to 1 yr apart, the mean FEV1 de cline was 54 ml/yr, with more rapid decline in males, those aged 30 to 44 yr, current smokers, those with FEV1 35 to 79% predicted, and thos e who ever had a bronchodilator response. Among all subjects, FEV1 dec line was not different between augmentation-therapy groups (p = 0.40). However, among subjects with a mean FEV1 35 to 49% predicted, FEV1 de cline was significantly slower for subjects receiving than for those n ot receiving augmentation therapy (mean difference = 27 ml/yr, 95% CI: 3 to 51 ml/yr; p = 0.03). Because this was not a randomized trial, we cannot exclude the possibility that these differences may have been d ue to other factors for which we could not control.