Two different approaches have shown that cancers express mutant protei
ns that may be recognized as tumor-specific antigens. On the one hand,
DNA sequences known to be mutant in tumor cells have been used to sel
ect for mutant peptides that induce tumor-specific T cells (the so-cal
led ''reverse immunologic'' approach). On the other, T cells induced b
y vaccination with whole tumor cells have been used to identify tumor-
specific mutations in proteins (''direct immunologic approach''). Whil
e both approaches generate tumor-specific T cells that can lyse cancer
cells expressing the relevant mutant protein, the present study sugge
sts that there may be crucial differences, Mutant epitopes originally
defined from DNA sequences have so far been immunorecessive, and tumor
cells themselves generally appear unable to induce specific CD8(+) T
cells that recognize the encoded mutant gene product. In contrast, we
find that mutant epitopes identified by CD8(+) T cells stimulated by i
mmunization with whole tumor cells induce cytolytic T cells to such mu
tant peptides. In fact, much or all of the response appears to be to a
single mutant octapeptide that seems to be immunodominant. One possib
le reason for the failure of immunorecessive antigens to induce a resp
onse may be the presence of lower amounts of the antigen in the cancer
cell, but other mechanisms are possible as well. For example, in the
host bearing a growing tumor, neither purified proteins nor peptides m
ight be known; thus, only immunodominant unique antigens may be able t
o restimulate and activate tumor-specific memory T cells that localize
in the tumor following active immunization.