Bma. Howard et al., STUDIES ON MUTATIONAL CROSS-RESISTANCE BETWEEN CIPROFLOXACIN, NOVOBIOCIN AND COUMERMYCIN IN ESCHERICHIA-COLI AND STAPHYLOCOCCUS-WARNERI, Microbios, 75(304), 1993, pp. 185-195
Nalidixic acid resistant mutants of Escherichia coli KL16 were tested
against ciprofloxacin, coumermycin and novobiocin. The mutants gyrA, n
alB and nal-24 were more resistant than KL16 to ciprofloxacin, whereas
the nal-31 strain was hypersensitive. Only the nalB mutant was more r
esistant to novobiocin than KL1 6, but gyrA, nal-31 and nal-24 mutants
were more sensitive to coumermycin than KL16. Newly-isolated novobioc
in-resistant mutants of KL16 were not cross-resistant to coumermycin o
r ciprofloxacin. Some coumermycin-resistant mutants were cross-resista
nt to novobiocin but not ciprofloxacin, whereas mutants resistant to n
ovobiocin and ciprofloxacin were isolated at higher coumermycin concen
trations. Two types of Staphylococcus warneri mutant were isolated on
media containing novobiocin or coumermycin. Each was resistant to both
coumarins, but one was highly resistant to novobiocin and the other t
o coumermycin. High level resistance to both coumarins was unstable. E
. coli mutants differed in susceptibility to bactericidal concentratio
ns of ciprofloxacin, and S. warneri mutants behaved similarly. These r
esults suggest the modes of action of the coumarins are not identical.