6-MONTH ANGIOGRAPHIC AND CLINICAL FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS PROSPECTIVELYRANDOMIZED TO RECEIVE EITHER TIROFIBAN OR PLACEBO DURING ANGIOPLASTY IN THE RESTORE TRIAL
Cm. Gibson et al., 6-MONTH ANGIOGRAPHIC AND CLINICAL FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS PROSPECTIVELYRANDOMIZED TO RECEIVE EITHER TIROFIBAN OR PLACEBO DURING ANGIOPLASTY IN THE RESTORE TRIAL, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 32(1), 1998, pp. 28-34
Objectives. This study sought to investigate the effects of tirofiban
versus placebo on the incidence of adverse cardiac outcomes and corona
ry artery restenosis at 6 months. Background. Tirofiban is a highly se
lective, short-acting inhibitor of fibrinogen binding to platelet glyc
oprotein IIb/IIIa. In a recent clinical study, tirofiban reduced the i
ncidence of adverse cardiovascular events at both 2 and 7 days after c
oronary angio plasty or directional coronary atherectomy. This reducti
on persisted but was no longer statistically significant at 30 days. M
ethods. The Randomized Efficacy Study of Tirofiban for Outcomes and Re
stenosis (RESTORE) trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-contr
olled trial of tirofiban in patients undergoing balloon angioplasty or
directional atherectomy within 72 h of presentation with either unsta
ble angina pectoris or acute myocardial infarction. All patients recei
ved an initial bolus (10 mu g/kg body weight over 3 min), followed by
a 36-h infusion (0.15 mu g/kg per min) of either tirofiban or placebo.
Results. At 6 months the composite end point (either death from any c
ause, new myocardial infarction, bypass surgery for angioplasty failur
e or recurrent ischemia, repeat target vessel angioplasty or stent ins
ertion for actual or threatened abrupt closure) occurred in 1,070 plac
ebo group patients (27.1%) and 1,071 tirofiban group patients (24.1%,
p = 0.11). Analysis of 6 month coronary arteriograms by means of quant
itative coronary arteriography showed no significant difference betwee
n placebo- and tirofiban-treated patients in either the incidence of a
greater than or equal to 50% diameter stenosis (57% vs. 51%, p = NS),
a loss of greater than or equal to 50% of lumen diameter gained (50%
vs. 50%, p = NS) or a loss of greater than or equal to 0.72 mm of lume
n diameter (44% vs. 42%, p = NS). Conclusions. The 3% absolute reducti
on in the incidence of the composite end point at 6 months (27.1% plac
ebo vs. 24.1% tirofiban) was similar to that previously reported at 2
days (8.7% vs. 5.1%, p < 0.005), and there does not appear to be any l
ate effect of tirofiban on clinical end points between day 2 and 6 mon
ths. Tirofiban did not reduce the incidence of restenosis at 6 months
when defined in a number of ways. (C) 1998 by the American College of
Cardiology.