6-MONTH ANGIOGRAPHIC AND CLINICAL FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS PROSPECTIVELYRANDOMIZED TO RECEIVE EITHER TIROFIBAN OR PLACEBO DURING ANGIOPLASTY IN THE RESTORE TRIAL

Citation
Cm. Gibson et al., 6-MONTH ANGIOGRAPHIC AND CLINICAL FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS PROSPECTIVELYRANDOMIZED TO RECEIVE EITHER TIROFIBAN OR PLACEBO DURING ANGIOPLASTY IN THE RESTORE TRIAL, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 32(1), 1998, pp. 28-34
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
ISSN journal
07351097
Volume
32
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
28 - 34
Database
ISI
SICI code
0735-1097(1998)32:1<28:6AACFO>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Objectives. This study sought to investigate the effects of tirofiban versus placebo on the incidence of adverse cardiac outcomes and corona ry artery restenosis at 6 months. Background. Tirofiban is a highly se lective, short-acting inhibitor of fibrinogen binding to platelet glyc oprotein IIb/IIIa. In a recent clinical study, tirofiban reduced the i ncidence of adverse cardiovascular events at both 2 and 7 days after c oronary angio plasty or directional coronary atherectomy. This reducti on persisted but was no longer statistically significant at 30 days. M ethods. The Randomized Efficacy Study of Tirofiban for Outcomes and Re stenosis (RESTORE) trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-contr olled trial of tirofiban in patients undergoing balloon angioplasty or directional atherectomy within 72 h of presentation with either unsta ble angina pectoris or acute myocardial infarction. All patients recei ved an initial bolus (10 mu g/kg body weight over 3 min), followed by a 36-h infusion (0.15 mu g/kg per min) of either tirofiban or placebo. Results. At 6 months the composite end point (either death from any c ause, new myocardial infarction, bypass surgery for angioplasty failur e or recurrent ischemia, repeat target vessel angioplasty or stent ins ertion for actual or threatened abrupt closure) occurred in 1,070 plac ebo group patients (27.1%) and 1,071 tirofiban group patients (24.1%, p = 0.11). Analysis of 6 month coronary arteriograms by means of quant itative coronary arteriography showed no significant difference betwee n placebo- and tirofiban-treated patients in either the incidence of a greater than or equal to 50% diameter stenosis (57% vs. 51%, p = NS), a loss of greater than or equal to 50% of lumen diameter gained (50% vs. 50%, p = NS) or a loss of greater than or equal to 0.72 mm of lume n diameter (44% vs. 42%, p = NS). Conclusions. The 3% absolute reducti on in the incidence of the composite end point at 6 months (27.1% plac ebo vs. 24.1% tirofiban) was similar to that previously reported at 2 days (8.7% vs. 5.1%, p < 0.005), and there does not appear to be any l ate effect of tirofiban on clinical end points between day 2 and 6 mon ths. Tirofiban did not reduce the incidence of restenosis at 6 months when defined in a number of ways. (C) 1998 by the American College of Cardiology.