K. Topalkara et al., EFFECTS OF FLASH FREQUENCY AND REPETITION OF INTERMITTENT PHOTIC-STIMULATION ON PHOTOPAROXYSMAL RESPONSES, Seizure (London), 7(3), 1998, pp. 249-255
The protocol used for intermittent photic stimulation (TPS) may determ
ine the likelihood of evoking a photoparoxysmal response (PPR). One-hu
ndred and thirty-five electroencephalograms (EEGs) presenting PPRs, fr
om 125 patients were studied in order to identify the most effective s
timulation frequency to evoke a PPR and the effects of repetition of T
PS on the occurrence of a PPR. Two stimulation protocols were used: pr
otocol I (starting at 18 Hz and then testing at 2, 6, 8, 10, 15, 20, 3
0, 40, 50, 60 Hz) and protocol II (stimulating at 2, 6, 8, 10,15, 18,
20, 30, 40, 50, 60 Hz). Protocol I was used for patients not known to
be photosensitive whereas protocol II was used for patients known to b
e photosensitive before recording. Both latency and PPR grade for freq
uencies which evoked PPR were measured in all records. The most epilep
togenic frequencies (those evoking grade 4 PPRs at the shortest latenc
y) were within the range 15-18 Hz for both protocols. In the records w
here the IFS was repeated at the same frequency, the PPR latency and g
rade seen during the first and second stimulation trial were studied i
n order to establish habituation or potentiation of responses. Repetit
ion of IFS at the same frequency induced habituation more often than p
otentiation, but only if trials were repeated consecutively which sugg
ests that habituation is frequency specific and trials repeated during
EEG recordings to confirm photosensitivity to a particular frequency
should be separated in time or be non-consecutive. Five patients studi
ed with protocol I (10.6%) showed a grade 4 PPR only during the initia
l trial at 18 Hz. Thus, as a general screening procedure for testing f
or photosensitivity commencing stimulation at 18 flashes/s appears to
be justified. The combination of two different protocols delivered to
patients with and without a history of photosensitivity appears to ach
ieve a sensible compromise having a high likelihood of demonstrating p
hotosensitivity with a minimum risk of precipitating seizures.