The number of civilian defensive gun uses (DGUs) against criminal atta
ckers is regularly invoked in public policy debates as a benefit of wi
despread private ownership of firearms. Yet there is considerable unce
rtainty for the prevalence of civilian DGUs, with estimates ranging fr
om 108,000 (using the National Crime Victimization Survey) to 2.5 mill
ion (using smaller telephone surveys) per year. In this paper we analy
ze the results of a new national random-digit-dial telephone survey to
estimate the prevalence of DGU and then discuss the plausibility of t
he results in light of other well-known facts and possible sources of
bias in survey data for sensitive behaviors. Because DGU is a relative
ly rare event by any measure, a small proportion of respondents who fa
lsely report a gun use can produce substantial overestimates of the pr
evalence of DGU, even if every true defensive gun user conceals his or
her use. We find that estimates from this new survey are apparently s
ubject to a large positive bias, which calls into question the accurac
y of DGU estimates based on data from general-population surveys. Our
analysis also suggests that available survey data are not able to dete
rmine whether reported DGU incidents, even if true, add to or detract
from public health and safety.