Substantial consistency has been obtained in describing plant response
to drying soil by expressing plant performance as a function of the f
raction of soil water that can be used by the plants, Generally, there
is no decrease in plant activity until the soil water has been decrea
sed to the level where only about 0.3 of the water that can be extract
ed by the plants remains in the soil, There is, however, ambiguity as
to whether this relationship is appropriate for sandy soils. The objec
tive of this research was to compare methods for describing extractabl
e soil water by soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] plants grown in pots
with soils differing in sand content, The two methods tested were base
d on thermodynamic and physiological definitions of the upper and lowe
r end-points of extractable soil water, While differences existed in t
he volumetric soil water content for the two definitions of the lower
end-point of extractable soil water, these differences were small, In
contrast, very large differences existed in defining the volumetric so
il water of the upper end-point either thermodynamically (commonly ass
umed to be -10 kPa for sands) or physiologically (pot capacity), As a
consequence, there were large differences in the response curves obtai
ned based on the two expressions of extractable soil water. The thresh
old for transpiration expressed as an absolute volumetric soil water w
as of course independent of the determination of the end-points, Inste
ad of relying on a relative transpiration response to extractable soil
water, for sandy soils it may be necessary to use the volumetric soil
water content determined under controlled conditions to interpret cro
p response under any particular field situation.