Ea. Erslev, LIMITED, LOCALIZED NONVOLATILE ELEMENT FLUX AND VOLUME CHANGE IN APPALACHIAN SLATES, Geological Society of America bulletin, 110(7), 1998, pp. 900-915
Geometric evidence for major nonvolatile volume losses at several Appa
lachian slate localities contradicts geochemical evidence for minimal
compositional changes during low-grade metamorphism of shales, Relativ
e to adjoining microlithons, spaced cleavage zones are depleted in Si
(quartz), Na (albite), and, for carbonate-rich slates, Ca, Mn, and Mg
(calcite and dolomite), Zr, Ti, Al, P,and Fe are enriched in cleavage
zones; the greatest enrichments are in Zr. Proportional Ii gains and N
a and Si losses suggest that cleavage fractionation combines stoichiom
etric reactions (e.g., K+ + albite + chlorite = muscovite + SiO2 + Na) with pressure solution of quartz and carbonate minerals. Cleavage an
d sorting (pelite to psammite) fractionation patterns are similar but
can be distinguished by higher Zr in Al-rich cleavage zones relative t
o Zr in rich pelitic rocks. The compositional similarities of homogene
ous shales and slates do not indicate large volume losses during slate
metamorphism. For Paleozoic slates from localities where large volume
losses ha,le been hypothesized on geometric grounds (Martinsburg slat
e belt of Pennsylvania and New Jersey, Meguma Group of Nova Scotia, an
d Taconic slate belt of Vermont and New York), slate compositions show
no evidence of large nonvolatile volume losses relative to likely sha
le protoliths, Detailed sampling of slates folded at hand specimen to
quarry scales indicate that substantial element and volume fluxes are
Limited to the submeter scale, In small-scale folds, volume losses in
tight inner arcs appear to be balanced by volume gains in adjoining ar
eas. The complications of metamorphic recrystallization and heterogene
ous strain are probably responsible for erroneous interpretations of l
arge nonvolatile volume losses in these Appalachian slate localities.