A. Sanger et al., INDICATIONS FOR CORONARY STENT IMPLANTATION - COMPARISON OF ACUTE CARDIAC AND VASCULAR COMPLICATIONS IN RELATION TO INDICATION, Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift, 123(27), 1998, pp. 821-826
Background and objective: Coronary stents are used nowadays not only f
or the reduction of restenosis and for treating acute vessel occlusion
s after PTCA but also after acute myocardial infarction. This study wa
s undertaken to determine whether widening the indications has affecte
d the incidence of acute complications and to compare acute cardiac an
d vascular complications. Patients and methods: The data on 197 consec
utive patients (155 men, 42 women; mean age 62 +/- 9 [37-85] years) wi
th coronary stents were analysed retrospectively, divided into 5 group
s depending on the indications for the stent implantation: 1) acute or
threatened vessel occlusion after elective PTCA (>> bail-out <<); 2)
acute myocardial infarction (AMI); 3) unstable angina with threatened
vessel occlusion; 4) suboptimal primary results (angiographically asse
ssed) after PTCA; 5) elective stent implantation to prevent restenosis
. Acute or subacute stent thrombosis, side-branch occlusion, intra- an
d transmural infarction, death and emergency aortocoronary bypass oper
ation were classified as acute cardiac complications. Haemorrhage in t
he inguinal region requiring blood transfusion, false aneurysm and ope
rative vascular reconstruction were classified as vascular complicatio
ns. Results: An intended stent implantation was impossible in 18 patie
nts (primary success rate 91%). Independent of indication an acute or
chronic stent stenosis occurred in three (1.6%) and seven (3.9%) patie
nts, respectively. Side-branch occlusion was observed in 12 patients (
6.7%), transmural infarction in nine (5.6%). No emergency bypass opera
tion had to be performed. Comparing the different indication groups th
ere was a significantly increased rate of >> non-Q << infarctions in p
atients with unstable angina pectoris (P < 0.014). Among acute vascula
r complications (10 [5%] inguinal haemorrhages requiring transfusion a
nd 5 [2.5%] operative vascular reconstructions), false aneurysm was si
gnificantly more common in patients with AMI (P < 0.014). Comparing em
ergency and elective stent implantations, side-branch occlusions were
significantly more common in the former (12% vs. 0%; P < 0.08), as wer
e also >> non-Q << infarcts (10% vs. O%; P < 0.002). Conclusion: Coron
ary stent implantation for these indications, including AMI, can be ta
ken as firmly established. Stent thrombosis was not significantly incr
eased after >> bail out <<. Implantation in an acute ischaemic episode
led to a significantly higher incidence of side-branch occlusion and
>> non-Q << infarction.