A. Robert et al., CONTROL OF ORAL ANTICOAGULATION IN PATIENTS WITH THE ANTIPHOSPHOLIPIDSYNDROME - INFLUENCE OF THE LUPUS ANTICOAGULANT ON INTERNATIONAL NORMALIZED RATIO, Thrombosis and haemostasis, 80(1), 1998, pp. 99-103
The recommended therapeutic range of International Normalized Ratio (I
NR) for oral anticoagulant treatment in patients with the antiphosphol
ipid syndrome remains controversial. As a part of this controversy, it
has been suggested that lupus anticoagulants (LA) could interfere wit
h the determination of prothrombin time, thus questioning the validity
of monitoring the treatment of these patients using INR. To clarify t
his point, we compared the values of INR obtained in the plasmas of tw
o groups of patients, one without LA (n = 47), and the other with LA (
n = 43). INR were determined using 8 different thromboplastin reagents
on the same automated coagulation instrument. Chromogenic factor X, w
hich is supposed to be insensitive to the presence of LA, was also mea
sured. The results are the following: provided INR was calculated usin
g calibrated reference plasmas, there was no significant difference be
tween INR values obtained with the 8 reagents, both in the non-LA and
in the LA groups (CV: 5.9 and 6.7%, respectively). Closer examination
revealed that INR results obtained with one reagent (the recombinant t
hromboplastin Innovin) diverged from those of the 7 others, leading to
an overestimation of INR, to a very large extent in some instances. H
owever this effect was restricted to a subset of the patient populatio
n with LA (6 out of 43). Finally, the relationship between INR (averag
e value obtained using the 8 reagents) and factor X was identical in n
on-LA and in LA patient groups. We conclude that, provided the reagent
s which display the LA interference are identified and excluded for th
is purpose, the INR system is valid for monitoring oral anticoagulant
treatment in patients with LA.