CONTROL OF ORAL ANTICOAGULATION IN PATIENTS WITH THE ANTIPHOSPHOLIPIDSYNDROME - INFLUENCE OF THE LUPUS ANTICOAGULANT ON INTERNATIONAL NORMALIZED RATIO

Citation
A. Robert et al., CONTROL OF ORAL ANTICOAGULATION IN PATIENTS WITH THE ANTIPHOSPHOLIPIDSYNDROME - INFLUENCE OF THE LUPUS ANTICOAGULANT ON INTERNATIONAL NORMALIZED RATIO, Thrombosis and haemostasis, 80(1), 1998, pp. 99-103
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Hematology,"Peripheal Vascular Diseas
Journal title
ISSN journal
03406245
Volume
80
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
99 - 103
Database
ISI
SICI code
0340-6245(1998)80:1<99:COOAIP>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
The recommended therapeutic range of International Normalized Ratio (I NR) for oral anticoagulant treatment in patients with the antiphosphol ipid syndrome remains controversial. As a part of this controversy, it has been suggested that lupus anticoagulants (LA) could interfere wit h the determination of prothrombin time, thus questioning the validity of monitoring the treatment of these patients using INR. To clarify t his point, we compared the values of INR obtained in the plasmas of tw o groups of patients, one without LA (n = 47), and the other with LA ( n = 43). INR were determined using 8 different thromboplastin reagents on the same automated coagulation instrument. Chromogenic factor X, w hich is supposed to be insensitive to the presence of LA, was also mea sured. The results are the following: provided INR was calculated usin g calibrated reference plasmas, there was no significant difference be tween INR values obtained with the 8 reagents, both in the non-LA and in the LA groups (CV: 5.9 and 6.7%, respectively). Closer examination revealed that INR results obtained with one reagent (the recombinant t hromboplastin Innovin) diverged from those of the 7 others, leading to an overestimation of INR, to a very large extent in some instances. H owever this effect was restricted to a subset of the patient populatio n with LA (6 out of 43). Finally, the relationship between INR (averag e value obtained using the 8 reagents) and factor X was identical in n on-LA and in LA patient groups. We conclude that, provided the reagent s which display the LA interference are identified and excluded for th is purpose, the INR system is valid for monitoring oral anticoagulant treatment in patients with LA.