M. Sarwar et Ja. Kirkegaard, BIOFUMIGATION POTENTIAL OF BRASSICAS - II - EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENT ANDONTOGENY ON GLUCOSINOLATE PRODUCTION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR SCREENING, Plant and soil, 201(1), 1998, pp. 91-101
Biofumigation refers to the suppression of soil-borne pests and pathog
ens by biocidal compounds released by Brassicaceous green manure and r
otation crops when glucosinolates (GSLs) in their tissues are hydrolys
ed. We investigated the effect of environment and ontogeny on the GSL
production, and thus biofumigation potential, of eight entries from fi
ve Brassica species. The environments included autumn and spring sown
field plots (FA and FS) and potted plants grown under ambient conditio
ns (PAM) or in a temperature controlled glasshouse at 20 degrees C/12
degrees C (PTC). GSL concentration was measured in the root and shoot
tissue at buds-raised, flowering and maturity. Of particular interest
was the suitability of the pot-grown plants for screening large number
s of brassicas for GSL production. The type of GSLs present in the tis
sues and their relative proportions remained relatively constant acros
s environments and at different growth stages, with the exception of a
n increase in indolyl GSLs in the FS environment suspected of being in
duced by insect attack. Total GSL concentration generally declined fro
m buds-raised to flowering in all environments, and was lowest at matu
rity. The exceptions were B. campestris, which had higher GSL concentr
ation at flowering than at buds-raised, and the PTC environment in whi
ch most species also showed an increase at flowering. Despite GSL type
s and their proportions remaining relatively constant, the total GSL c
oncentration in the root and shoot tissue of all entries varied signif
icantly with environment (3-10-fold) and was generally ranked FS>PAM>F
A>PTC. Interactions between species and environments meant that the ra
nking of the Brassica entries for total shoot and root GSL concentrati
on changed with environment. However within three entries from B. napu
s, the ranking was consistent across the environments. The added effec
t of environment on phenological development and biomass production fu
rther influenced GSL production (the product of GSL concentration and
biomass) on a ground area basis. The results suggest that glasshouse e
nvironments can be used to determine the types and proportions of GSLs
present, and to rank entries within, but not between species for the
total concentration in the tissues. However the influence of the envir
onment on both GSL concentration and biomass production suggests that
an accurate estimate of GSL production on a ground area basis to asses
s biofumigation potential will require measurement in the target envir
onment.