A. Casas et al., COMPARISON OF HOLSTEIN, CHARBRAY, AND ZEBU BULLS FOR BEEF-PRODUCTION UNDER ROTATIONAL GRAZING - I - GRAZING PERFORMANCE AND ECONOMIC-EVALUATION, The Journal of agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico, 81(3-4), 1997, pp. 101-113
Two grazing trials (GT1; GT2) were conducted over a period of three ye
ars, and effect of breed, season, and breed x season was observed on t
he grazing performance of 87 Holstein, Charbray, and Zebu (mostly Brah
man) bulls, The Zebu and Charbray bulls exhibited higher (P < 0.05) av
erage daily gains (0.60, 0.57 vs. 0.45 kg) and mean final weights (502
.5, 478.4 vs. 438.9 kg) than the Holstein bulls. Overall, average dail
y gains (ADG) were similar (P > 0.05) during spring, summer, and fall
but significantly higher than in the winter months (P < 0.05). Falteri
ng ADG started in late autumn of GT1 and in late winter of grazing GT2
, depending on when the cattle were started on test, and were the cons
equence of the combined effects of seasonal restraints on pasture grow
th and the need of greater dry matter intakes at higher stocking weigh
ts,The breed x season interaction was significant (P < 0.05). Holstein
bulls had significantly lower (P < 0.05) ADG in summer and fall, but
no significant difference was found among breeds in winter and spring.
Net returns per animal after considering variable costs were $154.72,
$134.49, and $77.47 for the Zebu, Charbray, and Holstein bulls, respe
ctively. Costs not considered in the economic evaluation were fence an
d pasture depreciation, interest on investment, land cost, and overhea
d expenses.