The present article examines 2 predictions concerning conditional reas
oning in children derived from a revised version of Markovits's model
of conditional reasoning. he first study examined the prediction that
younger children (8 years of age) would have greater difficulty in res
ponding correctly to premises where the antecedent was strongly associ
ated with the consequent than to premises where the association was we
aker; for example, ''If something is a car, then it has a motor'' shou
ld be more difficult than ''If something is a refrigerator, then it ha
s a motor.'' A total of 55 children In grades 2 and 3 (average age: 8
years) and 49 children in grades 5 and 6 (average age: II years) were
given either 2 strongly associated problems or weakly associated count
erparts. Results indicated that 8-year-olds did better on the weakly a
ssociated problems than on the strongly associated problems, but there
was no difference among the 11-year-olds. The second study examined t
he prediction that younger children (8 years of age) would have greate
r difficulty in responding correctly to causal premises (''If a rock i
s thrown at a window, the window Mill break'') than to corresponding a
d hoc premises (''A rock is something that can be used to break a wind
ow''). A total of 53 children in grades 2 and 3 (average age: 8 years)
and 49 children in grades 5 and 6 (average age: 11 years) were, given
either 2 causal problems or ad hoc counterparts. Results indicated th
at X-year-olds did better on the ad hoc problems than on the causal pr
oblems, but there was no difference among the II-year-olds. These stud
ies are interpreted as consistent with the idea that 1 major factor in
the development of reasoning in this age level is the development of
children's ability to explore their own knowledge base.