Purpose: Because the natural history of carotid body tumors is believe
d to be unpredictable, immediate surgical removal has been recommended
. The present study reviews our experience in the diagnosis and treatm
ent of these uncommon lesions. Methods: The medical records of patient
s who appeared for treatment with carotid body tumors between 1981 and
1997 were reviewed. Patients demographics, mode of presentation, imag
ing and treatment modalities, Shamblin classification, and neurologic
complications (stroke, cranial nerve injuries) were analyzed. Results.
Over the past 16 years, 31 patients with 32 carotid body tumors have
been evaluated, with an average follow-up of 3.2 years. The patients w
ere arbitrarily classified into two groups on the basis of the mode of
detection. Seventy percent (23 of 32) of the tumors discovered on cli
nical or self-examination were classified as Group 1; 28% (9 of 32) of
the tumors detected during duplex scanning for carotid artery disease
(8) or MRT (1) were classified as Group 2. The mean size of chemodect
omas found on palpation (4.3 +/- 1.7 cm) was larger than that of those
detected by duplex ultrasound (2.7 +/- 1.0 cm; p < 0.05, by paired t
test). Preoperative embolization was successfully performed in 5 of 6
instances of large tumors; the remaining patient suffered a procedure-
related stroke. Thirty-one carotid body tumors were resected. In one c
ase, the tumor was felt by the primary surgeon to be too small (0.9 x
0.7 cm on duplex scan) to warrant immediate excision; this patient is
being followed by periodic duplex scanning. Five neurologic complicati
ons were noted in Group 1, one after preoperative embolization and fou
r after surgery. One cranial nerve injury occurred in Group 2. One pat
ient had a large recur rent chemodectoma with clinical evidence of met
astatic disease. Conclusion: The increasing use of sophisticated imagi
ng modalities may allow earlier discovery of carotid body tumors befor
e they can be clinically detected. Resection of carotid body tumors of
all sizes in appropriate surgical candidates remains the standard of
care. Unfortunately, resection of even small tumors is associated with
a low but constant incidence of neurologic complications.