Pd. Hanson et al., EFFECT OF INTRAMEDULLARY POLYMETHYLMETHACRYLATE AND AUTOGENOUS CANCELLOUS BONE ON HEALING OF FROZEN SEGMENTAL ALLOGRAFTS, Journal of orthopaedic research, 16(3), 1998, pp. 285-292
This study was designed to compare bone mineral density, periosteal ca
llus production, new bone formation, bone porosity, histologic appeara
nce, and union of mid-diaphyseal segmental allografts of the femur sta
bilized with an interlocking nail technique in a canine model 6 months
after the procedure. An in vivo study was performed to compare the ef
fects of augmenting interlocking nail fixation with an interlocking na
il alone, intramedullary polymethylmethacrylate, intramedullary polyme
thylmethacrylate and autogenous cancellous bone applied to the periost
eal surface of the host-allograft junction, autogenous cancellous bone
applied to the endosteal surface of the allograft, autogenous cancell
ous bone applied to the periosteal surface of the host-allograft junct
ion, and autogenous cancellous bone applied to the periosteal surface
of the host-allograft junction and to the endosteal surface of the all
ograft. There were no differences among treatments for bone mineral de
nsity at any time interval. Callus area 4 weeks after the procedure wa
s greater along the lateral and cranial surfaces for treatments with p
eriosteal cancellous bone (p < 0.05). New bone within the allograft se
gment did not differ among treatments and was reduced compared with th
e host-allograft junctions (p < 0.05). The amount and quality of bone
tissue at the host-allograft junctions were greatest with treatments o
f intramedullary polymethylmethacrylate and autogenous cancellous bone
applied to the periosteal surface of the host-allograft junction and
of autogenous cancellous bone applied to the periosteal surface of the
host-allograft junction and to the endosteal surface of the allograft
(p < 0.05). The rate of bone union was lower, and there was a greater
gap (non-bone tissue) remaining between host and allograft bone with
treatment involving just intramedullary polymethylmethacrylate than wi
th other treatments (p < 0.05). The results suggest that augmenting in
terlocking nail fixation with intramedullary polymethylmethacrylate by
itself offers no advantage but that a combination of intramedullary p
olymethylmethacrylate and cancellous bone at the periosteal surface or
of cancellous bone within the medullary canal and at the periosteal s
urface improves the quality of healing at 6 months.