ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE AND CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS OF COTRIMOXAZOLE VERSUS AMOXICILLIN FOR PNEUMONIA AMONG CHILDREN IN PAKISTAN - RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Wl. Straus et al., ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE AND CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS OF COTRIMOXAZOLE VERSUS AMOXICILLIN FOR PNEUMONIA AMONG CHILDREN IN PAKISTAN - RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL, Lancet, 352(9124), 1998, pp. 270-274
Background Cotrimoxazole is widely used in treatment of paediatric pne
umonia in developing countries, but drug resistance may decrease its e
ffectiveness. We studied the effectiveness of co-trimoxazole compared
with that of amoxycillin in pneumonia therapy, and assessed the clinic
al impact of co-trimoxazole resistance. Methods We recruited 595 child
ren, aged 2-59 months, with non-severe or severe pneumonia (WHO criter
ia) diagnosed in the outpatient wards of two urban Pakistan hospitals.
Patients were randomly assigned on a 2:1 basis co-trimoxazole (n=398)
or amoxycillin (n=197) in standard WHO doses and dosing schedules, an
d were monitored in study wards. The primary outcome was inpatient the
rapy failure (clinical criteria) or clinical evidence of pneumonia at
outpatient follow-up examination. Findings There were 92 (23%) therapy
failures in the cotrimoxazole group and 30 (15%) in the amoxycillin g
roup (p=0.03)-26 (13%) versus 12 (12%) among children with non-severe
pneumonia (p=0.856) and 66 (33%) versus 18 (18%) among those with seve
re pneumonia (p=0.009). For patients with severe pneumonia, age under
1 year (p=0.056) and positive chest radiographs (p=0.005) also predict
ed therapy failure. There was no significant association between antim
icrobial minimum inhibitory concentration and outcome among bacteraemi
c children treated with co-trimoxazole. Interpretation Co-trimoxazole
provided effective therapy in non-severe pneumonia. For severe, life-t
hreatening pneumonia, however, co-trimoxazole is less likely than amox
ycillin to be effective.