DIFFERENCES BETWEEN AMLODIPINE AND LISINOPRIL IN CONTROL OF CLINIC AND 24 HOUR AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURES

Citation
Ar. Lorimer et al., DIFFERENCES BETWEEN AMLODIPINE AND LISINOPRIL IN CONTROL OF CLINIC AND 24 HOUR AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURES, Journal of human hypertension, 12(6), 1998, pp. 411-416
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Peripheal Vascular Diseas
ISSN journal
09509240
Volume
12
Issue
6
Year of publication
1998
Pages
411 - 416
Database
ISI
SICI code
0950-9240(1998)12:6<411:DBAALI>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
The anti-hypertensive efficacy of once-daily amlodipine (up to 10 mg) and lisinopril (up to 20 mg) were compared in terms of clinic and ambu latory blood pressure (BP) control, in an observer-blind, two-period c rossover study. Following a 4-week placebo run-in period, patients und erwent two active treatment phases each lasting 12 weeks and separated by a 4-week washout period. Sixty patients with a supine diastolic BP between 90 and 120 mm Hg were included, irrespective of whether or no t they had received previous anti-hypertensive medication. Amlodipine reduced supine systolic and diastolic clinic BP significantly more tha n lisinopril (-20 +/- 2/-14 +/- I vs -11 +/- 3/-7 +/- 1 mm Hg; P = 0.0 2/ P = 0.001) 24 h post-dose. Clinic standing diastolic BP was also si gnificantly reduced with amlodipine compared with lisinopril (P = 0.05 ). Both drugs produced control of mean ambulatory BP relative to basel ine over 24 h. Amlodipine showed more consistent control of BP over th e 24-h period in contrast to lisinopril which exerted its greatest eff ect during the daytime.