R. Williard et E. Oneil, TRENDS AMONG BIOMEDICAL INVESTIGATORS AT TOP-TIER RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS - A STUDY OF THE PEW SCHOLARS, Academic medicine, 73(7), 1998, pp. 783-789
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal","Education, Scientific Disciplines","Medical Informatics
Purpose. To gather information and opinions from promising young scien
tists at top-tier research institutions to learn how they are being af
fected by the changing biomedical research environment and to present
highlights from some of the major reports in the literature on trends
in biomedical education and employment in the United States. Method. I
n 1996, the authors conducted a survey of all individuals who had been
chosen as awardees in the Pew Scholars Program in the Biomedical Scie
nces between 1985 and 1995. This group was chosen because it represent
s independently-identified highly successful investigators at tap-tier
biomedical research institutions in the United States. Results. Overa
ll, the members of the study group performed better than did their pee
rs nationwide regarding time to degrees, ages at first position, and f
irst awards of federal funding. Nonetheless, even within this above-av
erage cohort, trends were identified that indicate a general aging of
young scientists. Not surprisingly, members of this cohort had greater
access to federal funds for training and were more likely to pursue c
areers in academia than their peers nationwide. Despite the success of
this well-positioned cohort of scientists, their views on the job mar
ket, the supply of biomedical scientists, and the training of students
were surprisingly pessimistic. Conclusion. The study findings provide
information about early career paths of investigators at top-tier res
earch institutions. In addition, the views of this successful cohort s
erve to inform the current dialogue and questions that remain about th
e future health of biomedical research and education in the United Sta
tes. Educators, prospective and current students, and members of the p
olicy community may find it.useful to consider these findings and the
questions they raise, some of which the authors present.