Based on analysis of 60 tape-recorded or observed interviews from a Da
nish social welfare office the article examines the Lipssky-like quest
ion: How and to what extent are macro structures such as social legisl
ation and local municipal rules brought into real live existence in th
e meeting between case workers and clients? To what extent do the case
workers show rule-conforming practice? Illustrated by several extract
s, it is shown that the legislation is not a simple governing instance
and that the case workers do not serve as simple tools for fulfilling
decisions made as formal rules at a macro level, On the contrary, the
case workers made use of those rules and official client or benefit c
ategories that seemed helpful to them for their own professional purpo
ses, and so did the clients in order to secure their interests. All in
all, the case workers showed a considerable distance to social securi
ty office which was presented for the clients as distant and partly ho
stile towards the clients.