EVIDENCE THAT A TREATMENT-FREE INTERVAL OF LESS-THAN 6 MONTHS DOES NOT EQUATE WITH CLINICALLY DEFINED PLATINUM RESISTANCE IN OVARIAN-CANCEROR PRIMARY PERITONEAL CARCINOMA
M. Markman et al., EVIDENCE THAT A TREATMENT-FREE INTERVAL OF LESS-THAN 6 MONTHS DOES NOT EQUATE WITH CLINICALLY DEFINED PLATINUM RESISTANCE IN OVARIAN-CANCEROR PRIMARY PERITONEAL CARCINOMA, Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 124(6), 1998, pp. 326-328
The standard definition of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer or primar
y peritoneal carcinoma commonly includes patients whose disease initia
lly responded to a platinum-based combination regimen, but recurred le
ss than 6 months after the completion of primary therapy. Recent exper
ience with several patients with these malignancies treated in the Gyn
ecologic Cancer Program of the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, whose dise
ase recurred within this period but who subsequently responded to plat
inum therapy, calls into question the validity and clinical relevance
of this commonly employed definition, both for the conduct of phase 2
trials of new agents in ovarian cancer and primary peritoneal carcinom
a, and for the standard management of women in this clinical setting.