The biomedical model currently dominates psychiatric clinical practice
and research. Unfortunately, this dominance had led increasingly to b
iological reductionism. This paper examines the historical and sociopo
litical underpinnings of the biomedical model, and illustrates some of
the common scientific distortions of reductionistic thinking. These o
bservations are applied to recent directions in mental health policy a
nd are used to provide a basis for alternative perspectives of mental
illness and psychiatric research.