S. Brown et al., EARLY OBSTETRIC DISCHARGE - DOES IT MAKE A DIFFERENCE TO HEALTH OUTCOMES, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology, 12(1), 1998, pp. 49-71
Clinicians in several countries have expressed concerns about possible
adverse effects of shortening obstetric length of stay. A population-
based survey of 1366 mothers who gave birth in Victoria, Australia, in
1993 was used to investigate social and obstetric characteristics of
mothers discharged home 'early', and to assess whether shorter stays w
ere associated with adverse health outcomes, or a lesser degree of sat
isfaction, or both. Women's views and experiences of length of hospita
l stay were gathered via a statewide postal survey of women who gave b
irth in a 2-week period; 62.5% (n = 1336) responded. Assessment of the
relationship between length of stay (1-2 days vs. greater than or equ
al to 5 days, and 3-4 days vs. greater than or equal to 5 days) and fo
ur main outcome measures (infant feeding at 6 weeks, period prevalence
of feeding problems, maternal confidence and depression) showed no as
sociation between these variables and length of stay after adjusting f
or other obstetric and social factors in separate regression analyses.
For stays of 3-4 days, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for formula feedi
ng at 6 weeks was 1.35 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9-1.9]; for fee
ding problems OR = 0.87 [0.7-1.2]; for lacking confidence OR = 0.81 [0
.6-1.2]; and for depression OR = 0.96 [0.7-1.4]. Large randomised tria
ls of early obstetric discharge are required to resolve continuing unc
ertainties about the safety, and possible benefits of shorter hospital
stays.